Ostarine (MK-2866 / Enobosarm)
The prototypical, most clinically studied SARM — an oral nonsteroidal androgen-receptor agonist that reliably adds lean body mass in trials but has never won FDA approval, failed its pivotal muscle-function endpoint, and carries real liver, lipid and hormonal harm signals.
What it is
Ostarine (developmental code MK-2866; International Nonproprietary Name enobosarm; also GTx-024, S-22) is an orally bioavailable nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulator originally developed by GTx Inc. and now advanced by Veru Inc. It is the single most clinically studied compound in the SARM class, having gone through multiple randomized controlled trials for cancer-associated muscle wasting (cachexia), androgen-receptor-positive breast cancer, and — most recently — preservation of muscle during GLP-1 (semaglutide) weight loss. Despite roughly two decades of clinical development, ostarine/enobosarm is NOT an approved drug in any country and remains investigational. In the United States it is an unapproved drug that cannot legally be sold as a dietary supplement, yet it is widely and illegally sold online as a bodybuilding "research chemical," which is the context in which most consumer harm reports arise.
How it works
Ostarine binds the androgen receptor and acts as a tissue-selective agonist. Being nonsteroidal, it is engineered to produce anabolic effects in muscle and bone while causing comparatively little androgenic activity in the prostate and skin; in its clinical program, lean-mass gains occurred without reported prostate effects, virilization, or hirsutism. The proposed basis for selectivity is tissue-specific AR coregulator recruitment and differential receptor conformation/signaling in muscle versus reproductive tissue, though the exact molecular determinants remain incompletely characterized.
Efficacy — what the human evidence shows
The Institute grades each claimed effect by the strength of the human evidence behind it. Grades are assigned independently for benefit and for harm.
Safety signals
Harm signals are reported prominently even where the evidence grade is low. Absence of evidence is not evidence of safety.
Human trials on record
| Study / registry | Phase | Population | Key result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dobs et al., Lancet Oncology 2013 (NCT00467844) | Phase 2 | ~159 patients with NSCLC, colorectal cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, CLL, or breast cancer at risk of/with cachexia | Met primary endpoint: enobosarm 1 mg and 3 mg significantly increased total lean body mass vs placebo, with a signal for improved physical function; well tolerated without androgenic toxicity. |
| POWER 1 & POWER 2 (GTx, reported 2013) | Phase 3 | ~300 patients each (~600 total) with stage III/IV NSCLC starting first-line chemotherapy; enobosarm 3 mg/day vs placebo | FAILED the co-primary responder endpoints agreed with FDA. Significant lean-body-mass benefit vs placebo, but NO improvement in physical function (stair-climb power). Development for cachexia terminated; no approval. |
| Study G200802 / Palmieri et al., Lancet Oncology 2024 (PMID 38342115) | Phase 2 (randomized, open-label) | 136 patients with previously treated AR+/ER+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer; 9 mg (n=72) vs 18 mg (n=64) | Clinical benefit rate ~32% (9 mg) and ~29% (18 mg) at 24 weeks; antitumor activity with low-grade, manageable adverse events; no added benefit at 18 mg. |
| ARTEST (NCT04869943, Veru) | Phase 3 | AR+/ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, enobosarm 9 mg monotherapy vs active control; discontinued | Discontinued for strategic reprioritization with only 34 evaluable patients randomized; ORR 12.5% (2/16) enobosarm vs 0% (0/18) control — underpowered and inconclusive, not a completed efficacy read-out. |
| QUALITY Phase 2b (Veru, topline 2025) | Phase 2b | 168 adults ≥60 yr, overweight/obese, on semaglutide (WEGOVY); enobosarm 3 mg/6 mg vs placebo | Met primary endpoint of lean-mass preservation; ~99% of weight loss was fat; ~54.5% fewer patients with ≥10% stair-climb-power decline vs placebo. 3 mg advanced toward Phase 3; not yet approved. |
Legal & regulatory status
The bottom line
Ostarine/enobosarm is the SARM with by far the strongest clinical dossier, and that dossier is instructive precisely because it is sobering: across two decades and multiple randomized trials the compound consistently adds DXA lean body mass, yet it has NEVER been approved anywhere and its pivotal Phase 3 muscle-wasting trials (POWER) failed to prove the thing that actually matters to patients — better physical function. Its most credible current prospects (breast cancer, GLP-1 muscle preservation) rest on Phase 2/2b surrogate data still awaiting Phase 3 confirmation. On safety, absence of approval means absence of a fully characterized safety profile, and the harm signals are real, not theoretical: cholestatic liver injury (including cases specifically tied to ostarine), HDL/lipid suppression with FDA-flagged cardiovascular risk, testosterone suppression, and a spectrum of serious adverse-event reports. Consumer products are also routinely mislabeled or adulterated. Bottom line for a reader: this is an unapproved investigational drug and a WADA-banned substance, not a supplement — the lean-mass data are genuine but the functional benefit is unproven and the liver, lipid, and hormonal risks are established enough to take seriously.
References
- Effects of enobosarm on muscle wasting and physical function in patients with cancer: a double-blind, randomised controlled phase 2 trial
- Study Design and Rationale for the Phase 3 Clinical Development Program of Enobosarm (POWER Trials)
- GTx Reports Results for Enobosarm POWER Trials for the Prevention and Treatment of Muscle Wasting in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (co-primary physical-function endpoint not met)
- Activity and safety of enobosarm in AR+, ER+, HER2- advanced breast cancer (Study G200802): a randomised phase 2 trial
- Veru Reports Clinical Data from the Discontinued ARTEST Study of Enobosarm in AR+ ER+ HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
- Veru Announces Positive Topline Data from Phase 2b QUALITY Study: Enobosarm Preserved Lean Mass in Patients Receiving Semaglutide
- FDA Warns of Use of Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs) Among Teens, Young Adults
- Selective androgen receptor modulator use and related adverse events including drug-induced liver injury: analysis of suspected cases (ostarine-specific cholestatic DILI cases; CAERS data)
- Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs)-Induced Liver Injury: A Case Report and Review of Literature
- Substance Profile: What athletes need to know about ostarine (WADA S1 anabolic agent; not approved for human use)
- The Prohibited List (Section S1 Anabolic Agents — SARMs prohibited at all times)
This review is for education and does not provide medical or legal advice. No SARM is approved for human use.